ActiveCampaign vs Make (Integromat): Which is Better?
Make (Integromat) scores higher overall with 7.9/10 compared to ActiveCampaign's 7.9/10. ActiveCampaign wins in 3 categories, while Make (Integromat) wins in 1 categories. Make (Integromat) offers a free plan, while ActiveCampaign does not.
ActiveCampaign vs Make (Integromat)
A
ActiveCampaign
7.9
$29/mo
VS
M
Make (Integromat)
7.9
$9/mo
Winner
Score-by-Score Comparison
| Dimension | ActiveCampaign | Make (Integromat) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 7.9 | 7.9 | Tie |
| Features | 8.4 | 8.0 | ActiveCampaign |
| Business Fit | 8.2 | 7.8 | ActiveCampaign |
| Pricing Value | 6.8 | 8.2 | Make (Integromat) |
| Usability | 7.5 | 7.5 | Tie |
| Integrations | 8.8 | 8.8 | Tie |
| Public Sentiment | 8.0 | 7.8 | Tie |
| Momentum | 7.2 | 7.5 | Make (Integromat) |
| Trust & Reliability | 8.5 | 8.0 | ActiveCampaign |
| Freshness | 7.8 | 7.8 | Tie |
ActiveCampaign Pros & Cons
Pros
- Powerful automation builder with AI
- CRM and sales automation included
- Excellent integration ecosystem
- Strong for complex multi-step workflows
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than simpler tools
- -No free plan
- -Pricing increases with contacts
- -Interface can feel overwhelming
Make (Integromat) Pros & Cons
Pros
- Powerful visual workflow builder
- More affordable than Zapier
- Good for complex multi-step automations
- Strong API connectivity
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -AI features less developed
- -Smaller integration library than Zapier
Pricing Comparison
ActiveCampaign
$29/mo
Free Trial
per-usage
Make (Integromat)
$9/mo
Free Plan
per-usage
Our Verdict
Make (Integromat) is the overall winner in this comparison with a score of 7.9/10. ActiveCampaign wins in 3 dimensions while Make (Integromat) wins in 1 dimensions. Choose ActiveCampaign if you prioritize features and business fit. Choose Make (Integromat) if you prioritize pricing value and momentum.